← Browse

@yogsoth-ai/final-validation

A

Self-review the North Star + ResearchBrief for completeness, consistency,

skillclaude

Install

agr install @yogsoth-ai/final-validation --target claude

Writes 1 file into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-edecb911.

  • .claude/skills/final-validation/SKILL.md

Document


name: final-validation description: Self-review the North Star + ResearchBrief for completeness, consistency, and clarity before presenting to user. If issues found, return to specific tactic/SOP for targeted fix. If passes, present final output to user for confirmation. execution: dialogue

Final Validation

Quality gate before final output.

Execution

Dialogue — inline, CC performs self-review then presents.

Self-Review Checks

  1. Placeholder scan: any TBD, empty sections, incomplete information?
  2. Internal consistency: do any sections contradict each other?
  3. Completeness: any critical information gaps that would block downstream work?
  4. Ambiguity: any requirement interpretable two different ways?

If Issues Found

Return to the specific tactic/SOP that can fix the gap. Targeted fix, not full re-run.

If Passes

Present North Star + ResearchBrief to user.

What to Ask

  • Is this the direction you want to pursue?
  • Does anything need adjustment?
  • Are you ready to move forward with this as your research brief?

Output

User-confirmed North Star + ResearchBrief (final artifacts).

Trustgrade A

  • passBody integrity

    Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.

  • passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type

    Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.

  • passFreshness

    How long since the source repository was last pushed to.

  • passPrompt injection

    Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.

  • passLicense

    Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.

How the grade is calculated

Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:

  • Aevery check passed
  • Bone warning
  • Ctwo warnings
  • Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
  • Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong

These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.

Versions

  • git-edecb91180c22026-07-31