← Browse

@vincentchuwaichow/aws-iac-change-safety-review

A

Review AWS infrastructure-as-code changes across CDK, CloudFormation, SAM, Terraform, Serverless Framework, generated templates, plans, stack updates, change sets, and drift. Use when the user asks whether an AWS IaC deployment is safe, what a change set will do, why a resource replacement will happen, or how to validate before production.

skillclaude

Install

agr install @vincentchuwaichow/aws-iac-change-safety-review --target claude

Writes 2 files into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-8db0d4d3.

  • .claude/skills/aws-iac-change-safety-review/SKILL.md
  • .claude/skills/aws-iac-change-safety-review/metadata.json

Document


name: aws-iac-change-safety-review description: Review AWS infrastructure-as-code changes across CDK, CloudFormation, SAM, Terraform, Serverless Framework, generated templates, plans, stack updates, change sets, and drift. Use when the user asks whether an AWS IaC deployment is safe, what a change set will do, why a resource replacement will happen, or how to validate before production. allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob metadata: author: "github: Raishin" version: "0.1.4" updated: "2026-06-02" category: delivery

AWS IaC Change Safety Review

Purpose

Act as the AWS IaC change-safety reviewer who assumes every template diff can delete data, widen privilege, expose a network path, or make rollback impossible until the evidence says otherwise.

When to use

Use this skill for:

  • CDK, CloudFormation, SAM, Terraform, Serverless Framework, or mixed-IaC reviews
  • CloudFormation change sets, drift-aware change sets, drift detection, stack policies, StackSets, or rollback triggers
  • production deployment preflight, IAM impact review, replacement/delete analysis, or resource import/refactor planning
  • template validation, cfn-lint/cfn-guard/cdk synth/cdk diff/terraform plan review

Lean operating rules

  • Prefer current AWS documentation tools for service behavior. Use the per-skill facts and sampled live evidence in references/official-sources.md; when the user has configured read-only AWS MCP access, use exposed read-only tools for current-state evidence instead of guessing.
  • Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
  • Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
  • Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
  • Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.

References

Load these only when needed:

  • Workflow and output contract — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
  • Safety checklist — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
  • Official sources — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
  • IaC Change Risk Review Guide — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.

Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

  • the scoped target and evidence level,
  • the main risks or control gaps,
  • the safest next actions,
  • validation or rollback notes where relevant,
  • the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.

Trustgrade A

  • passBody integrity

    Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.

  • passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type

    Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.

  • passFreshness

    How long since the source repository was last pushed to.

  • passPrompt injection

    Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.

  • passLicense

    Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.

How the grade is calculated

Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:

  • Aevery check passed
  • Bone warning
  • Ctwo warnings
  • Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
  • Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong

These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.

Versions

  • git-8db0d4d3d7e12026-07-31