@tiann/execplan
BWhen writing complex features or significant refactors or user ask explicitly, use an ExecPlan from design to implementation.
Install
agr install @tiann/execplan --target claudeWrites 2 files into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-9b1f4b2f.
- .claude/skills/execplan/README.md
- .claude/skills/execplan/SKILL.md
Document
name: execplan description: When writing complex features or significant refactors or user ask explicitly, use an ExecPlan from design to implementation.
Create an execution plan following PLANS.md methodology.
Instructions
- Read PLANS.md first - This contains all methodology, requirements, structure, and guidelines
- Follow the process and skeleton defined in
PLANS.mdto the letter
Trustgrade B
- passBody integrity
Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.
- passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type
Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.
- passFreshness
How long since the source repository was last pushed to.
- passPrompt injection
Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.
- warnLicenseno SPDX license detected
Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.
How the grade is calculated
Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:
- Aevery check passed
- Bone warning
- Ctwo warnings
- Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
- Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong
These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.
Versions
git-9b1f4b2f26ac2026-07-30