← Browse

@majiayu000/council-debug

B

Use for systematic debugging and root cause analysis with both Codex and Gemini. Triggers on "council debug", "council root cause", "have council investigate this bug", "council find the issue".

skillclaude

Install

agr install @majiayu000/council-debug --target claude

Writes 2 files into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-b98b114e.

  • .claude/skills/council-debug/SKILL.md
  • .claude/skills/council-debug/metadata.json

Document


name: council-debug description: Use for systematic debugging and root cause analysis with both Codex and Gemini. Triggers on "council debug", "council root cause", "have council investigate this bug", "council find the issue".

Council Debug Skill

Systematic debugging and root cause analysis with both Codex (GPT-5.2) and Gemini.

When to Use

  • Complex bugs requiring investigation
  • Mysterious errors or failures
  • Performance issues
  • Race conditions or timing problems
  • When user asks for debugging help from the council

Reasoning Level

xhigh (always - debugging requires deep analysis)

Execution

  1. Gather all relevant context:

    • Error messages
    • Stack traces
    • Relevant code files
    • Logs if available
  2. Formulate a debugging prompt:

    Debug this issue systematically:
    
    Problem: <description of the bug>
    
    Error: <error message/stack trace>
    
    Relevant Code:
    <code snippets>
    
    Please:
    1. Identify potential root causes
    2. Analyze each possibility
    3. Determine the most likely cause
    4. Suggest a fix
    
  3. Run BOTH commands in parallel:

    Codex:

    codex exec --sandbox read-only -c model_reasoning_effort="xhigh" "<prompt>"
    

    Gemini:

    gemini -s -y -o json "<prompt>"
    
  4. Synthesize debugging insights

Response Format

## AI Council Debug Report

### Codex (GPT-5.2) Diagnosis:
**Potential Causes:**
1. [Cause with likelihood]
2. [Cause with likelihood]

**Root Cause Analysis:**
[Detailed analysis]

**Suggested Fix:**
[Code or steps to fix]

---

### Gemini Diagnosis:
**Potential Causes:**
1. [Cause with likelihood]
2. [Cause with likelihood]

**Root Cause Analysis:**
[Detailed analysis]

**Suggested Fix:**
[Code or steps to fix]

---

### Council Synthesis:
**Agreed Root Cause:** [If both agree]
**Conflicting Theories:** [If they differ]
**Recommended Fix:** [Synthesized fix strategy]
**Confidence Level:** [Based on agreement]

---
*Session IDs: Codex=[id], Gemini=[id]*

Repository README

Describes majiayu000/claude-skill-registry-data as a whole, which may contain artifacts other than this one. Where this artifact had no useful description of its own, its summary was taken from here.

Claude Skill Registry (Data)

This repo contains the archived skill contents (the heavy, browsable skill files).

Canonical layout

  • Category folders at repo root (e.g. development/, documents/, data/, ...)
  • Each skill lives under a category: <category>/<skill>/SKILL.md + <category>/<skill>/metadata.json
  • Case conflicts are resolved with {name}-{owner}-{repo} suffixes (fallback: -{short-hash}).

Archive status

  • Live badges above are sourced from claude-skill-registry-core stats.json.
  • Counts in this README are intentionally dynamic, not hardcoded.
  • If the badges look stale, refresh the core build/index pipeline rather than editing numbers here.

Where the index + site live

Trustgrade B

  • passBody integrity

    Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.

  • passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type

    Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.

  • passFreshness

    How long since the source repository was last pushed to.

  • passPrompt injection

    Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.

  • warnLicenseno SPDX license detected

    Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.

How the grade is calculated

Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:

  • Aevery check passed
  • Bone warning
  • Ctwo warnings
  • Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
  • Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong

These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.

Versions

  • git-b98b114e0d482026-07-31