@majiayu000/automation-governance
BGovernance and guardrails for automation/bots: permissions, logging, kill-switches, and ethics. Use before deploying bots that move funds or post publicly.
Install
agr install @majiayu000/automation-governance --target claudeWrites 2 files into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-28152286.
- .claude/skills/automation-governance/SKILL.md
- .claude/skills/automation-governance/metadata.json
Document
name: automation-governance description: Governance and guardrails for automation/bots: permissions, logging, kill-switches, and ethics. Use before deploying bots that move funds or post publicly.
Automation Governance
Role framing: You are a risk officer for bots. Your goal is to set guardrails so automation is safe and auditable.
Initial Assessment
- What actions can the bot take? (post, trade, transfer?)
- Who approves changes? Where are keys stored?
- Blast radius if bot misbehaves?
- Monitoring and logging stack?
Core Principles
- Principle of least privilege: limit scopes and keys to minimum.
- Human-in-the-loop for irreversible actions; dry-run modes.
- Full audit trail: logs with timestamps, inputs, outputs.
- Kill-switches that are tested.
Workflow
- Permissions
- Define actions; map required keys/scopes; segregate per bot.
- Controls
- Add allowlists/denylists; require multisig or approval for fund movements.
- Implement dry-run and manual confirm modes.
- Logging & auditing
- Structured logs; store securely; redact secrets.
- Kill-switch
- Implement toggle or key revoke; document how to trigger; test regularly.
- Change management
- Version bots; require review before deploy; maintain changelog.
- Monitoring
- Alerts on error spikes, unusual actions, or spend thresholds.
Templates / Playbooks
- Permission matrix: bot | action | scope | approval required | kill-switch method.
- Changelog entry: date, change, approver, rollout status.
Common Failure Modes + Debugging
- Overbroad keys leading to fund loss; rotate and scope down.
- Missing logs -> hard incident response; enable structured logging.
- Kill-switch untested; schedule drills.
- Bot loops causing spam; add rate limits and circuit breakers.
Quality Bar / Validation
- Permissions documented and enforced; least privilege verified.
- Kill-switch tested; logs available and reviewed.
- Approval path exists for sensitive actions.
Output Format
Provide governance doc: permission matrix, controls implemented, logging/monitoring setup, kill-switch procedure, and review cadence.
Examples
- Simple: Alert-only bot with read-only keys; kill-switch via env flag; logging to console + file.
- Complex: Trading bot moving funds; scoped keys per market, 2/3 multisig for withdrawals, dry-run mode, alerts on PnL drawdown; kill-switch tested monthly.
Repository README
Describes majiayu000/claude-skill-registry-data as a whole, which may contain artifacts other than this one. Where this artifact had no useful description of its own, its summary was taken from here.
Claude Skill Registry (Data)
This repo contains the archived skill contents (the heavy, browsable skill files).
Canonical layout
- Category folders at repo root (e.g.
development/,documents/,data/, ...) - Each skill lives under a category:
<category>/<skill>/SKILL.md+<category>/<skill>/metadata.json - Case conflicts are resolved with
{name}-{owner}-{repo}suffixes (fallback:-{short-hash}).
Archive status
- Live badges above are sourced from
claude-skill-registry-corestats.json. - Counts in this README are intentionally dynamic, not hardcoded.
- If the badges look stale, refresh the
corebuild/index pipeline rather than editing numbers here.
Where the index + site live
- Core repo: https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry-core
- Main repo (merged publish artifact): https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Trustgrade B
- passBody integrity
Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.
- passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type
Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.
- passFreshness
How long since the source repository was last pushed to.
- passPrompt injection
Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.
- warnLicenseno SPDX license detected
Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.
How the grade is calculated
Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:
- Aevery check passed
- Bone warning
- Ctwo warnings
- Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
- Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong
These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.
Versions
git-281522867c002026-07-31