@josephschmitt/review-plan-wait
ASends a plan file to Monocle and blocks until the reviewer responds with feedback. Use in plan mode or whenever reviewer approval is needed before proceeding.
Install
agr install @josephschmitt/review-plan-wait --target claudeWrites 1 file into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-44be2ff9.
- .claude/skills/review-plan-wait/SKILL.md
Document
name: review-plan-wait description: Sends a plan file to Monocle and blocks until the reviewer responds with feedback. Use in plan mode or whenever reviewer approval is needed before proceeding.
Send Plan to Monocle and Wait for Review
Submits a plan file to Monocle and blocks until the reviewer responds with feedback.
Important: This is for content that isn't already a tracked file change — plans, architecture docs, summaries, etc. You do NOT need to send regular code files; Monocle automatically picks up file changes in the workspace and shows them as diffs.
Steps
-
Find the plan file — if the user provided a path via
$ARGUMENTS, use that. Otherwise, find the most recently modified plan file in the project. -
Read the plan file to confirm it exists and get its filename.
-
Run
monocle review send-artifact --waitwith:--title: The first markdown heading from the plan, or the filename if no heading found--file: Absolute path to the plan file--id: The plan filename (e.g.my-plan.md) — ensures updates replace the previous version--type:md--wait: Blocks until the reviewer responds
-
Handle the response:
- If the reviewer approved with no comments, inform the user and continue
- If the reviewer provided feedback requesting changes, share the feedback with the user and act on it — update the plan, then run
monocle review send-artifact --waitagain - Keep iterating until the reviewer approves
If any command fails with a message that Monocle is not running, let the user know they need to start Monocle with monocle in the same directory as the project.
Trustgrade A
- passBody integrity
Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.
- passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type
Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.
- passFreshness
How long since the source repository was last pushed to.
- passPrompt injection
Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.
- passLicense
Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.
How the grade is calculated
Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:
- Aevery check passed
- Bone warning
- Ctwo warnings
- Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
- Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong
These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.
Versions
git-44be2ff983d82026-07-31