@infometa/design-to-code
BMCP server package @claude-code-plugins-plus/design-to-code
Install
agr install @infometa/design-to-code --target claudeThis artifact does not publish files for Claude.
Document
{ "name": "@claude-code-plugins-plus/design-to-code", "version": "1.0.0", "description": "Convert Figma designs and screenshots to code components (React, Svelte, Vue)", "type": "module", "main": "./dist/servers/design-converter.js", "scripts": { "build": "tsc", "test": "vitest" }, "keywords": ["mcp", "figma", "design", "code-generation", "components", "a11y"], "author": { "name": "Intent Solutions", "url": "https://intentsolutions.io" }, "license": "MIT", "dependencies": { "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "^0.7.0", "zod": "^3.23.0", "zod-to-json-schema": "^3.23.0" }, "devDependencies": { "@types/node": "^20.19.21", "typescript": "^5.6.0", "vitest": "^2.1.0" } }
Trustgrade B
- passBody integrity
Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.
- warnType matchbest-effort: server code not analyzed
Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.
- passFreshness
How long since the source repository was last pushed to.
- passPrompt injection
Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.
- warnLicenseno SPDX license detected
Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.
How the grade is calculated
Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:
- Aevery check passed
- Bone warning
- Ctwo warnings
- Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
- Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong
These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.
Versions
git-d19c7465e44d2026-08-03