@gtmagents/quota-health
AUse to analyze quota distribution, attainment fairness, and productivity
Install
agr install @gtmagents/quota-health --target claudeWrites 1 file into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-ee6f9c2f.
- .claude/skills/quota-health/SKILL.md
Document
name: quota-health description: Use to analyze quota distribution, attainment fairness, and productivity signals.
Quota Health Review Skill
When to Use
- During annual planning to align quotas with territory potential.
- Mid-year to diagnose underperformance risks or over-assignment.
- Before launching compensation plan changes or SPIFs.
Framework
- Data Collection – pull attainment, pipeline, coverage, and territory metrics by rep/segment.
- Fairness Analysis – compute attainment distribution, Gini coefficient, and coverage ratios.
- Signal Review – identify chronic over/under assignments, ramp issues, or constrainted territories.
- Recommendation Engine – suggest quota rebalancing, enablement, or hiring adjustments.
- Governance – log proposed changes, approval needs, and communication strategy.
Templates
- Quota health dashboard (rep-level KPIs, quartiles, recommendations).
- CRO briefing outline with risks/opportunities.
- Quota adjustment request form with approvals.
Tips
- Pair with
territory-optimizationoutputs to ensure coverage and quota stay in sync. - Normalize attainment for ramping reps to avoid skewed fairness scores.
- Keep change logs auditable for finance and legal.
Trustgrade A
- passBody integrity
Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.
- passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type
Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.
- passFreshness
How long since the source repository was last pushed to.
- passPrompt injection
Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.
- passLicense
Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.
How the grade is calculated
Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:
- Aevery check passed
- Bone warning
- Ctwo warnings
- Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
- Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong
These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.
Versions
git-ee6f9c2fd7442026-07-31