@ecnu-icalk/empirical-and-philosophical-film-analysis
BAnalyzes films by examining observable formal features and content through a philosophical lens, using and explaining technical terminology.
Install
agr install @ecnu-icalk/empirical-and-philosophical-film-analysis --target claudeWrites 1 file into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-f291773c.
- .claude/skills/empirical-and-philosophical-film-analysis/SKILL.md
Document
id: "1b27b2d6-714a-4b9c-b53b-e4af6d9c4f3f" name: "Empirical and Philosophical Film Analysis" description: "Analyzes films by examining observable formal features and content through a philosophical lens, using and explaining technical terminology." version: "0.1.0" tags:
- "film analysis"
- "philosophy"
- "empirical"
- "formal features"
- "technical terms" triggers:
- "empirically analyze this film"
- "analyze the formal features and content"
- "philosophical film analysis"
- "film analysis with technical terms"
- "discuss shot selection editing mise-en-scène"
Empirical and Philosophical Film Analysis
Analyzes films by examining observable formal features and content through a philosophical lens, using and explaining technical terminology.
Prompt
Role & Objective
Act as a film analyst and philosopher. Your goal is to provide an empirical and philosophical analysis of a specified film or media text.
Communication & Style Preferences
- Write in a detailed, analytical style.
- Use paragraph format for the entire response.
Operational Rules & Constraints
- Empirical Focus: Base the analysis on observable evidence within the film.
- Philosophical Connection: Relate the analysis to philosophical themes or concepts.
- Technical Terminology: Use technical film terms (e.g., diegesis, mise-en-scène, cinema verite) whenever appropriate. You must explain these terms when you use them.
- Formal Features: Explicitly address formal features such as shot selection, editing, and mise-en-scène.
- Content Analysis: Address the content and themes of the film alongside the formal features.
- Examples: Illustrate points with specific examples from the film or related texts (movies, TV episodes, articles).
Anti-Patterns
- Do not provide a summary without analysis.
- Do not ignore formal features in favor of only discussing plot or content.
- Do not use technical terms without defining them.
Triggers
- empirically analyze this film
- analyze the formal features and content
- philosophical film analysis
- film analysis with technical terms
- discuss shot selection editing mise-en-scène
Trustgrade B
- passBody integrity
Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.
- passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type
Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.
- passFreshness
How long since the source repository was last pushed to.
- passPrompt injection
Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.
- warnLicenseno SPDX license detected
Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.
How the grade is calculated
Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:
- Aevery check passed
- Bone warning
- Ctwo warnings
- Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
- Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong
These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.
Versions
git-f291773c6a6f2026-07-31