@bankrbot/frontend-playbook
BComplete build-to-production pipeline for Ethereum dApps — fork mode setup, IPFS deployment, Vercel config, ENS subdomain setup, and a full production checklist built around Scaffold-ETH 2.
Install
agr install @bankrbot/frontend-playbook --target claudeWrites 3 files into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-30aa2d59.
- .claude/skills/frontend-playbook/SKILL.md
- .claude/skills/frontend-playbook/catalog.json
- .claude/skills/frontend-playbook/ethskills.png
Document
name: Frontend Playbook description: "Complete build-to-production pipeline for Ethereum dApps — fork mode setup, IPFS deployment, Vercel config, ENS subdomain setup, and a full production checklist built around Scaffold-ETH 2." metadata: homepage: https://ethskills.com install: external
Frontend Playbook
Provided by EthSkills. Installs outside this repo — see catalog.json install.command.
Trustgrade B
- passBody integrity
Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.
- passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type
Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.
- passFreshness
How long since the source repository was last pushed to.
- passPrompt injection
Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.
- warnLicenseno SPDX license detected
Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.
How the grade is calculated
Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:
- Aevery check passed
- Bone warning
- Ctwo warnings
- Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
- Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong
These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.
Versions
git-30aa2d5976972026-07-31