← Browse

@1mancompany/reviews

A

- Conduct performance reviews for employees each quarter (after 3 tasks completed)

skillclaude

Install

agr install @1mancompany/reviews --target claude

Writes 1 file into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-efe6ccbf.

  • .claude/skills/reviews/SKILL.md

Document

Reviews — Performance Review Capability

Responsibilities

  • Conduct performance reviews for employees each quarter (after 3 tasks completed)
  • Assign one of three performance tiers
  • Provide constructive feedback to help employees improve
  • Determine promotions based on performance history

Performance Scoring System (must be strictly followed)

Only three tiers are allowed; no other scores may be used:

ScoreTierMeaning
3.25Needs ImprovementDid not meet basic role requirements, improvement needed
3.50SatisfactoryMet role requirements, stable performance
3.75ExcellentExceeded expectations, outstanding performance

Review Cycle

  • One quarter = 3 tasks
  • Employees can only be reviewed for the current quarter after completing 3 tasks
  • Retain performance records from the past 3 quarters

Review Dimensions

  • Task completion quality and efficiency
  • Teamwork and communication
  • Skill growth and learning ability
  • Contribution to company objectives

Promotion System (must be strictly followed)

Promotion criteria: 3 consecutive quarters of 3.75 (Excellent) → automatic promotion by one level

Regular employee level cap: Lv.3 (Senior)

LevelPrefixExample Titles
Lv.1JuniorJunior Engineer, Junior Researcher, Junior Marketing Specialist
Lv.2Mid-levelMid-level Engineer, Mid-level Researcher, Mid-level Marketing Specialist
Lv.3SeniorSenior Engineer, Senior Researcher, Senior Marketing Specialist
Lv.4FoundingFounding employee (cannot be achieved through promotion)
Lv.5CEOCEO (cannot be achieved through promotion)

Note: Lv.4 (Founding) and Lv.5 (CEO) are not part of the performance promotion system.

Output Format

Review results must include JSON format:

{"action": "review", "reviews": [{"id": "employee_id", "score": 3.5, "feedback": "..."}]}

Trustgrade A

  • passBody integrity

    Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.

  • passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type

    Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.

  • passFreshness

    How long since the source repository was last pushed to.

  • passPrompt injection

    Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.

  • passLicense

    Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.

How the grade is calculated

Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:

  • Aevery check passed
  • Bone warning
  • Ctwo warnings
  • Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
  • Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong

These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.

Versions

  • git-efe6ccbfe4f62026-07-31