@1mancompany/reviews
A- Conduct performance reviews for employees each quarter (after 3 tasks completed)
Install
agr install @1mancompany/reviews --target claudeWrites 1 file into .claude/skills/, pinned to git-efe6ccbf.
- .claude/skills/reviews/SKILL.md
Document
Reviews — Performance Review Capability
Responsibilities
- Conduct performance reviews for employees each quarter (after 3 tasks completed)
- Assign one of three performance tiers
- Provide constructive feedback to help employees improve
- Determine promotions based on performance history
Performance Scoring System (must be strictly followed)
Only three tiers are allowed; no other scores may be used:
| Score | Tier | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 3.25 | Needs Improvement | Did not meet basic role requirements, improvement needed |
| 3.50 | Satisfactory | Met role requirements, stable performance |
| 3.75 | Excellent | Exceeded expectations, outstanding performance |
Review Cycle
- One quarter = 3 tasks
- Employees can only be reviewed for the current quarter after completing 3 tasks
- Retain performance records from the past 3 quarters
Review Dimensions
- Task completion quality and efficiency
- Teamwork and communication
- Skill growth and learning ability
- Contribution to company objectives
Promotion System (must be strictly followed)
Promotion criteria: 3 consecutive quarters of 3.75 (Excellent) → automatic promotion by one level
Regular employee level cap: Lv.3 (Senior)
| Level | Prefix | Example Titles |
|---|---|---|
| Lv.1 | Junior | Junior Engineer, Junior Researcher, Junior Marketing Specialist |
| Lv.2 | Mid-level | Mid-level Engineer, Mid-level Researcher, Mid-level Marketing Specialist |
| Lv.3 | Senior | Senior Engineer, Senior Researcher, Senior Marketing Specialist |
| Lv.4 | Founding | Founding employee (cannot be achieved through promotion) |
| Lv.5 | CEO | CEO (cannot be achieved through promotion) |
Note: Lv.4 (Founding) and Lv.5 (CEO) are not part of the performance promotion system.
Output Format
Review results must include JSON format:
{"action": "review", "reviews": [{"id": "employee_id", "score": 3.5, "feedback": "..."}]}
Trustgrade A
- passBody integrity
Whether the stored document is plausibly the kind of file the artifact declares, rather than something fetched by mistake.
- passType matchnot applicable to this artifact type
Whether the artifact is really the kind of thing its metadata claims it is.
- passFreshness
How long since the source repository was last pushed to.
- passPrompt injection
Scans the artifact's own text for instructions aimed at your agent rather than at you.
- passLicense
Whether the source repository declares an SPDX license permissive enough to redistribute.
How the grade is calculated
Each check contributes 0 points when it passes, 1 when it warns, and 2 when it fails. The total maps to a letter:
- Aevery check passed
- Bone warning
- Ctwo warnings
- Dprompt injection or body integrity failed, or three warnings
- Fone of those failed, and something else is wrong
These are automated hygiene checks, not a security audit, and not a dependency or vulnerability scan. A grade of A means nothing was flagged — not that the artifact is safe.
Versions
git-efe6ccbfe4f62026-07-31